Friday, March 7, 2008
WELCOME
Health Roundtable
The HIV/AIDS virus began to affect
At a meeting in 1988 the Board of Directors named AIDS as one of the ‘areas of concern’ that AFJN was to take on. The Annual Meeting in October 1989 featured Maryknoll father and doctor, Scott Harris, who gave a much appreciative and informative keynote speech on the disease and its implications for the Church in
The 1991-92 Operational Plan listed AIDS under areas of Justice and Peace needing to be singled out for special attention and action. In 1992, we find that the Annual Meeting featured a talk by Dr. Jean Mouch on the subject of AIDS. Other than that, the office continued a low level information gathering and sharing, collaborating with other groups until Carole Collins came on staff in 2000. She became very involved in the HIV/AIDS Working Group of the Advocacy Network for Africa (ADNA). That group produced six ‘one-pagers’ on different aspects of AIDS in
AIDS work rather quickly then became entwined with Trade work as WTO regulations were making it difficult for many African countries to get hold of affordable medicines. In 2001, AFJN lobbied with others to support compulsory licensing, which gave countries that were in a medical crisis the right to license AIDS drugs and sell them at cheaper prices. Much of this work ended up in the HR 933, “The Affordable HIV/AIDS Medicines for Poor Countries Act.”
With the Catholic Task Force on
Conflict Roundtable
In the beginning, “conflict resolution” did not exist. In fact, the concept of conflict resolution came later in AFJN’s history and was met with some initial resistance. In a 1993 Board of Directors’ meeting, the chair of the Board stated that, “There appears to be a new momentum to replace “justice and peace” issues with conflict resolution approaches, but conflict resolution needs to be fully explained since it is a novelty.” The AFJN staff was tasked with exploring the subject further.
Previous to 1993, AFJN had very much been in interested in the threats to peace and in the causes of conflict on the continent of
Nevertheless, the conflict in
Early efforts on issues of conflict resolution sprang from
Since the late 80s, AFJN has also been active on
In 1990, the staff report mentions that the office produced good material on the Horn of Africa and was consequently queried by Congress and the media. That same year, the office received material from members in then-Zaire and distributed that material to US members. From January-May 1992, according to the office report, AFJN had the ‘best updates on
In 2000, AFJN was very active in lobbying on
In 2001, the new Executive Director, Marcel Kitissou brought his expertise and interest in conflict resolution to AFJN. Having written and taught extensively on the subject, he developed the “Dealing with Transition and Coping with Change Project,” which was funded by several of the organizational members. Marcel chaired the Peace & Security Working Group of ADNA that met with the coordinator of the African Crisis Response Initiative (ACRI). He gave a briefing to the staff of the House sub-committee on conflict in
The Dealing with Transition and Coping with Change Project organized a summer lecture series, called "AFJN Summer Institute”, in
Muna Ndulo (ed.), Security, Reconstruction and Reconciliation: When the Wars End,
In April 2003, AFJN sponsored guest speakers on peace issues in Washington such as Sultan Somjee (he addressed three different groups at the Catholic Task Force on Africa, students and faculty at Cornell University and Utica College), Carolyn Nordstrom (for the very first Advocacy Days) who spoke on arms trafficking in Africa, and Cathy Majtenyi (AFJN correspondent who was working in Kenya) who spoke on Somali at AFJN 20th anniversary in McLean, VA and on the Horn of Africa at a peace studies conference at Ithaca College. The same year saw the beginning of a reflection and information sharing on the link between water and conflict. Marcel was one of the first in
Under Marcel’s initiative, AFJN sponsored a symposium on water issues at the Institute for African Development at Cornell University with participation of scholars in the US and Africa. Continued reflections on the topic resulted in a 2007 book:
Marcel Kitissou, Muna Ndulo, Mechthild Nagel, Margaret Grieco (eds.), The Hydro politics of Africa: a Contemporary Challenge, Cambridge Scholars Press,
In 2003, AFJN alerted the executive branch about the seriousness of the developments in
The resolution of the war in northern
AFJN organizing perhaps reached its nadir with the northern
Recently, much staff time has been spent on organizing around the crying needs in
Finally, a mention must be made of two new areas of work. The first is the recent engagement of AFJN staff in research and advocacy on the newly founded Africa Command (AFRICOM). The Board of Directors has made monitoring this entity a priority of AFJN for the next couple of years. Informational articles have been written both in the newsletter and on the web and a new coalition has formed in Washington of which AFJN is a major player. Secondly, AFJN is helping to gather people interested in advocacy on restorative justice. This has grown out of discussions at the ADNA meetings and a resolution has been put forth to Representative Donald Payne on the Africa Subcommittee.
Economic Justice Roundtable
In one of the first documents setting up the Africa Faith and Justice Network, the founders articulated the ‘scope’ of the work of AFJN. They were intent on working on issues or problems affecting Africa that had their origins in the ‘
From those first very broad mentions of economic policies and questions, AFJN has over the years worked on a number of different issues of economic justice. One of the first to be addressed was that of the debt of impoverished countries. At the 1987 Annual Meeting, Peter Henriot, S.J. and Prof. Brian Hehir gave talks on the debt. It was decided to put emphasis on that issue and an AFJN Issue Paper was subsequently produced. The next year, 1988, Sr. Maura Browne (one of the first staff members and the longest serving Executive Director), continued work on the debt by preparing a booklet on the subject that received several responses from members in
The operational plan of 89-90 called for work on the debt that included gathering information from Africa (materials and information from justice and peace groups as well as from missionaries), working with US coalitions, promoting a
The office report of 1990 notes that during a visit to
Board meetings (December 1993) continued to insist on a focus on “economic rights” amongst other things. Throughout the early nineties, the office continued to publish articles and to send mailings to the members encouraging them to lobby their members of Congress. That legislative work was expanded to include work on the Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) and to opposing the “Debt for Development Swaps” that many were supporting at the time.
The theme of the 1995 Annual Meeting was “Economic Justice in
In 1997, the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) was proposed by the
The Operational Plan for 1999-2000 saw a growth in activity on economic issues. It called for support of the Jubilee Campaign (AFJN became a member of the steering committee), for work on AGOA and the MAI, and for continued advocacy for reform of the IMF/World Bank, especially concerning their debt and SAP structures. Local input (from
The numerous trade issues and bills popping up in the Congress in the new millennium brought together AFJN and several other faith-based groups in DC to form the Interfaith Task Force on Trade and Investment. After a period of ‘self-education,’ the Task Force put down a list of ethical principles for international investment that were distributed to Congress and that have recently been updated and reprinted. Later, in 2004, a congressional resolution would come out of the work of this group. The Resolution on Just Trade called for trade based on the ethical principles outlined by this task force.
For the next few years, the GRI was the vehicle for most of the important work on economic issues. Larry Goodwin, staff member and Executive Director, conceived the GRI and found his inspiration during a six-week trip to
The GRI, in collaboration with Public Citizen also convinced Rep Jan Schakowsky to introduce a congressional resolution that called for water to be considered as a ‘human right.’ Eventually, as part of AFJN’s “Seeds & Water” initiative, the Water for the World Resolution stated that water is a public trust and a public good not a private commodity.” AFJN worked closely with AEFJN in
Along with those major efforts mentioned above, AFJN tackled a number of other issues. Research was done and information provided on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), on land usage, on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), especially concerning the patenting of life forms and the pricing and availability of AIDS medication. Through the Africa Trade Policy Working Group, which Larry Goodwin chaired, AFJN collaborated with other organizations to monitor the Free Trade Agreement with the Southern Africa Customs Union. In that, the group met with officials in the US Office of Trade Representative and wrote a letter to Robert Zoelleck calling for negotiations on the principles of human rights, the primacy of the common good and the protection of the global ecosystem.
It could be said, that during the period of GRI, AFJN led the way on many of the important trade issues being discussed in Washington and even created a body of knowledge on a subject that no one would have noticed (the plight of small holder farmers) had AFJN not concentrated so much effort upon it. AFJN’s enthusiastic participation in the formulation of the water and just trade resolutions was essential to their introduction in Congress and the attention that they received. These rather complicated and esoteric issues, however, did not always resonate with the members and oftentimes the staff found themselves trying to convince the members to get on board to lobby their members of Congress.
The wide range of groups working on the debt were eventually successful in bringing needed understanding and focus to the issue, so that debt relief is now something around which there is a general consensus that something should be done. In fact, a good deal of the debt has been canceled. AFJN was a long and important player in that advocacy.